You are losing up to ten percent of your collections if payer underpayments are not being aggressively pursued by your outsourced medical billing company. It is simply a minimum requirement of being in business that medical billing services compare your payments to the amounts your payers have agreed to pay you.

Any medical billing process must include features that are specifically designed to counteract the actions taken by payers to withhold money from medical practices and facilities. Examples of these features include: comparing claims to payers adjudication rules before submission, calling on submitted claims that have not been denied or paid, posting all payment information – including denials, pursuing underpayments, and using predictive payment estimates in the patient collection process.

Today’s focus will be on pursuing underpayments. The first step of this pursuit is comparing a practice’s Explanation of Benefits from the payers to the amounts the payers have agreed to pay for each procedure. Many billing processes assume the payment posters will catch these underpayments; this is a bad assumption. The billing process must have an automated comparison process.

Payers have adopted underpayment techniques that are too difficult for a payment poster to spot on their own. Medical billing companies can design their process to battle payers underpayment techniques because they have an advantage over individual practices – they see EOBs for a given payer across multiple practices and multiple states. The enhanced scope allows medical billing companies that pay attention to identify patterns that might be overlooked by individual medical practices.

A disturbing pattern that can regularly be seen by a medical billing company that is paying attention is one where a payer will select a set of procedures and underpay this set of procedures across a large number of providers (often by the same amount). This will continue for about 30 days and then the payer will resume paying the procedures at the correct amount and begin underpaying a whole new selection of procedures.

Each individual underpayment is typically less than $20 and often less than $10. It is, however, death by a thousand cuts as these small losses can quickly reduce a medical practice’s revenue by 5 to 10 percent. The tactics of constantly switching which CPTs are being underpaid and then underpaying in amounts that are small at the claim level make it hard for a practice to realize the magnitude of the money they are losing.

The pattern outlined above is why it is critical that a strategy for pursuing underpayments is not based upon payment posters picking up on the underpayments. Most payment posters will notice a large underpayment, but it is too much to expect them to spot a $5 underpayment.

Identifying and pursuing underpayments can yield big returns for a medical practice (the average practice can increase collections by 7%). Therefore, it is imperative that your billing service is aggressively pursuing these underpayments on your behalf.

After the underpayment has been noticed it must be relentlessly pursued – this is what actually leads to top line improvement for your practice. Even the small underpayments cannot be ignored – to do so will invite larger and more frequent underpayments. Payers are constantly testing their boundaries. If they see that you respond at the first sign of stepping across the boundary they will quickly fall in line and pursue less vigilant targets.

Copyright 2008 by Carl Mays II